Given the right circumstances, good people can get caught up in some very bad things. More often than not, psychology is to blame.
When it comes to unethical behavior, good people don’t tend to go right off the deep end like Bernie Madoff or Kenneth Lay.
Rather, the mind plays tricks on them, pushing them down the slippery slope of questionable behavior.
“Integrity is doing the right thing, even when no one is watching.” -C. S. Lewis
Dr. Muel Kaptein, Professor of Business Ethics and Integrity Management at the Rotterdam School of Management, has studied bad behavior for decades.
A study he recently published sheds considerable light on what motivates good people to do bad things.
What follows are 14 of Dr. Kaptein’s most compelling findings into how the mind tricks good people into losing their moral compass and going astray.
The compensation effect.
The compensation effect refers to the tendency for people to assume they accumulate moral capital.
We use good deeds to balance out bad deeds, or alternately, we give ourselves breaks from goodness, like a piece of chocolate after a week of salads. This makes people more inclined to do bad things under the guise of “I’m a good person” or “It’s just this one thing.”
A great example of this is a study in which people were observed lying and cheating more after they made the decision to purchase products that were good for the environment.
The power of names.
What you name something is important, as it can skew people’s sense of reality. If companies assign unethical practices simple and humorous euphemisms (like “financial engineering” for accounting fraud), employees are less likely to take their unethical behavior seriously.
Thomas Watson, the founder of IBM, was famous for saying, “Doing business is a game, the greatest game in the world if you know how to play it.” Something as simple as calling business a game can make people less likely to see that their actions have serious, real-world consequences.
Cognitive dissonance is the discomfort humans feel when they hold two contradictory opinions or their behavior is inconsistent with their beliefs. It’s one of the strongest psychological forces driving human behavior.
When people who feel they are good do bad things, cognitive dissonance makes them ignore this behavior because they can’t tolerate the inconsistency between their behavior and their beliefs.
Broken window theory.
The broken window theory argues that chaos and disorder in an organization make people believe they work for an ineffectual authority. In response, they are more likely to commit unethical behavior that’s in line with this perceived chaos.
An example of this was when New York City lowered major crime rates in the 1980’s by cracking down on petty crime.
Living in a city that was less riddled with crime, New Yorkers came to believe in the organization running their city, which slowed the rate of major crimes.
There’s nothing wrong with setting goals and driving hard to achieve them.
This only becomes a problem when people are possessed by a singular focus on a particular goal, to the point that they leave other important considerations such as compassion and ethics out of their thinking.
The Pygmalion effect.
The Pygmalion effect refers to the tendency people have to act the way that other people treat them.
For example, if employees are treated like they’re upright members of a team, they’re more likely to act accordingly. Alternately, if they’re treated with suspicion, they’re more likely to act in a way that justifies that perception.
The pressure to conform.
The pressure to conform is powerful.
When a group engages in unethical behavior, individuals are far more likely to participate in or condone that behavior rather than risk standing out.
Obedience to authority.
It’s quite difficult for most people to ignore the wishes of those in authority positions. People also feel like they’re less responsible for wrongdoings if they act under the direction of someone else.
Both of these reasons explain why employees are likely to act out the unethical wishes of their supervisors—and feel far less guilt than if they had decided to do it themselves.
We live in a society where there is often only one winner: one person wins the prize, one person gets the job, one person receives the credit. But does this competitive culture really produce the best outcomes?
When it comes to ethical behavior, the answer is no. When there is only one winner in a given situation, people are more likely to cheat rather than face the consequences of losing.
Social bond theory.
Employees are more likely to be loyal to their companies if they feel unique, valued, and important.
The more they feel that they’re replaceable and under-appreciated, the more likely they are to commit ethical violations.
The blinding effect of power.
People in power typically see themselves as inherently different from their employees.
This can lead them to set ethical boundaries for their employees that are more stringent than the ones they set for themselves. What happens next is the stuff of newspaper headlines.
When companies splash money around, they contribute to unethical behavior. Flashy displays of wealth lead to increased selfishness.
Employees either aim hard for these carrots or develop jealousy of their high-rolling colleagues who achieve them.
This leads to people who are more likely to put their own needs ahead of doing the right thing.
Acceptance of small theft.
One might think that taking small things from the workplace, like notebooks, pens, and computer paper, is harmless.
But when small thefts are ignored by management, people become far more likely to up the ante.
People like their freedom.
If they feel that the rules imposed on them are too strict or too restrictive, they often break those rules—and even go further against protocol than they otherwise would have.
Bringing it all together
Perhaps the most shocking thing about ethical violations is the simple, almost mundane conditions that contribute to them. Thankfully, a little bit of knowledge goes a long way in reducing environments that contribute to this behavior.
Have you seen any of these phenomena cloud people’s moral compass? Please share your thoughts in the comments section below, as I learn just as much from you as you do from me.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
I’m pleased to announce that I’ve just reissued one of my absolute favorite books. The Seagull Manageris a fun, lighthearted fable that teaches the three virtues of superior leadership. Best of all, the book is free on Amazon Kindle Unlimited.
Here’s what people are saying about it:
“I’ve been talking about seagull management for years. If you want to understand how to turn it around, read Travis Bradberry’s The Seagull Manager.” – Ken Blanchard, coauthor of The One Minute Manager
“There are several powerful leadership messages woven into this entertaining and memorable parable—teaching me when I was least prepared (and most ready) for it. I have a list of ten colleagues who will be getting a most-unexpected gift.” – Kenneth Forster, director, Global Customer Strategy, the Coca-Cola Company
“Dr. Bradberry provides a wonderful solution with an easy-to-understand and utilize three-step model that allows you to engage your team and generate improved results. Read it, and you’ll see a positive change in your future!” – Robert Savage, COO, Taco Bell, Yum Brands
Dr. Travis Bradberry is the award-winning co-author of the #1 bestselling book Emotional Intelligence 2.0 and the cofounder of TalentSmart. His bestselling books have been translated into 25 languages and are available in more than 150 countries. Dr. Bradberry has written for, or been covered by, Newsweek, TIME, Fortune, Forbes, Fast Company, Inc., USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, and The Harvard Business Review.
This article first appeared on Linkedin.